Did Paul Teach Against the Torah?
- Elizabeth Shulam

- 1 day ago
- 6 min read

Understanding Paul's Relationship to the Torah, the Messiah, and God's Instruction
2026. Elizabeth Shulam
The relationship between Paul and the Torah. It has created confusion in the Christian world for centuries.
Many readers encounter verses in Galatians or Romans and conclude that Paul opposed the Torah, abandoned Jewish practice, or taught that God's instruction no longer mattered. Others point to Paul's own lifestyle and argue that he remained Torah-observant throughout his life.
Which view is correct?
Did Paul abolish the Torah?
The answer requires careful reading of Scripture. Rather than approaching Paul through later theological debates, we must examine his own words, his own actions, and the world in which he lived.
What emerges is a far more nuanced picture than many modern readers expect.
Paul did not teach salvation through Torah observance. Neither did he teach that God's instruction had become worthless or irrelevant. Instead, Paul wrestled with one of the central questions facing the early community of believers:
How do Jewish and Gentile followers of the Messiah live together within God's covenant purposes?
Understanding Paul's answer begins with understanding Paul himself.
Paul Never Stopped Being Jewish
Paul consistently identified himself as Jewish.
Even after becoming an apostle to the nations, he wrote:
"I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin." (Romans 11:1, NRSVUE)
Before his encounter with Yeshua, Paul was trained as a Pharisee.
He describes himself as:
"A Hebrew born of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee." (Philippians 3:5, NRSVUE)
Nothing in Scripture suggests Paul stopped being Jewish after becoming a follower of Yeshua.
Rather, Paul understood faith in Messiah as the fulfillment of Israel's story.
His identity remained rooted in the covenant people of Israel even as his mission expanded to include the nations.
This fact alone should cause readers to slow down before concluding that Paul rejected the Torah altogether.
Paul's Actions in the Book of Acts
The book of Acts provides important insight into Paul's life.
If Paul openly taught Jews to abandon the Torah, we would expect his behavior to reflect that position.
Instead, Acts repeatedly presents Paul participating in Jewish life.
Paul Attended Synagogue
Throughout Acts, Paul regularly teaches in synagogues.
His pattern was consistent:
"As was his custom, Paul went in." (Acts 17:2, NRSVUE)
Synagogue participation remained a normal part of his ministry.
Paul Observed Biblical Festivals
Acts records Paul organizing travel around biblical feast days.
For example:
"We sailed from Philippi after the days of Unleavened Bread." (Acts 20:6, NRSVUE)
Later, Paul hurried toward Jerusalem for Shavuot (Pentecost).
These references suggest continued participation in the biblical calendar.
Paul Took a Nazirite-Style Vow
Acts 18:18 mentions Paul cutting his hair because of a vow.
Many scholars connect this practice to a Nazirite vow rooted in Torah tradition.
Paul Participated in Temple Rituals
Perhaps the strongest evidence appears in Acts 21.
Rumors circulated that Paul taught Jews living among the nations to abandon Moses.
The Jerusalem elders confronted the issue directly.
Their solution was simple: Paul would participate in Temple purification rites to demonstrate that the accusations were false.
Luke records:
"Thus all will know that there is nothing in what they have been told about you, but that you yourself observe and guard the law." (Acts 21:24, NRSVUE)
This passage is difficult to reconcile with the idea that Paul opposed Torah observance for Jewish believers.
What Was the Real Issue?
If Paul was not teaching Jews to abandon Torah, what was he arguing against?
The answer appears repeatedly throughout his letters.
Paul opposed the idea that Torah observance could function as a means of earning salvation or covenant membership.
The debate facing the early community was not whether Torah existed.
The debate was whether Gentiles had to become Jewish proselytes in order to be fully accepted within God's people.
Paul's answer was no.
This distinction changes everything.
Understanding Galatians
Galatians is often cited as proof that Paul abolished the Torah.
Yet Galatians addresses a very specific controversy.
Certain teachers were insisting that Gentile believers must undergo conversion to Judaism, including circumcision, in order to be fully accepted.
Paul strongly rejected that idea.
His concern was not the Torah itself.
His concern was the belief that Gentiles must become Jewish before entering covenant relationship with God.
Paul argues that salvation comes through faith in Messiah.
Abraham himself was declared righteous before circumcision.
For Paul, the inclusion of Gentiles through faith fulfills God's promises rather than violating them.
When Galatians is read within this context, the focus shifts from abolishing Torah to clarifying the basis of salvation.
What Does Paul Teach in Romans?
Romans presents Paul's most mature discussion of Torah.
Far from condemning it, Paul writes:
"So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and just and good." (Romans 7:12, NRSVUE)
That statement alone deserves attention.
Paul does not call the Torah evil.
He does not call it obsolete.
He describes it as holy, righteous, and good.
The problem, according to Paul, is not the Torah.
The problem is human sin.
The Torah reveals God's standards, but it cannot transform the human heart.
Only God's Spirit can accomplish that work.
Romans therefore presents a positive view of Torah while emphasizing humanity's need for redemption through Messiah.
Misunderstood Passages
Several passages are frequently misunderstood
"Christ Is the End of the Law"
Romans 10:4 is often translated:
"Christ is the end of the law."
The Greek word telos can mean end, goal, purpose, or culmination.
Many scholars argue Paul is describing Messiah as the goal toward which the Torah points rather than its termination.
"Not Under Law"
Paul frequently says believers are not "under law."
Within his argument, this phrase generally refers to being under the law's condemnation or jurisdiction as a means of justification.
It does not necessarily mean God's instruction has ceased to exist.
Colossians 2
This chapter is often interpreted as abolishing biblical observances.
Yet the passage focuses on judgment and human regulations rather than declaring God's instruction worthless.
Readers should be careful not to impose later theological assumptions onto Paul's language.
Torah and Salvation
One of Paul's clearest teachings concerns salvation.
Salvation comes through God's grace.
It is received through faith.
Human effort cannot earn redemption.
Paul repeatedly emphasizes this truth.
The Torah was never intended to function as a ladder by which people climb into God's favor.
Rather, it reveals God's character, God's standards, and humanity's need for redemption.
Messiah provides what humanity cannot achieve on its own.
This is why Paul can simultaneously affirm the goodness of Torah while insisting that salvation comes through faith.
The two ideas are not contradictory.
What About Gentile Believers?
The Jerusalem Council in Acts 15 addressed this question directly.
Must Gentiles become Jews in order to follow the Messiah?
The apostles answered no.
Gentiles were welcomed into God's people through faith.
This decision explains much of Paul's ministry.
His concern was not convincing Jews to stop being Jewish.
His concern was ensuring that Gentiles were not burdened with requirements God had not imposed upon them.
This distinction helps explain many of the debates found throughout the New Testament.
The Early Church and Torah
The earliest believers did not immediately abandon Jewish practice.
The Jerusalem congregation remained deeply connected to Jewish life.
Acts 21 describes thousands of Jewish believers who were:
"all zealous for the law." (Acts 21:20, NRSVUE)
The separation between Judaism and Christianity developed gradually over centuries.
Recognizing this historical reality helps readers better understand the New Testament world.
So Why Should I Care about this Now?
The life and teaching of Paul is not merely historical.
It affects how Christians read Scripture.
If Paul abolished the Torah, then much of the Bible becomes disconnected from Christian discipleship.
If Paul respected the Torah while teaching salvation through faith, then a more integrated understanding emerges.
The Hebrew Scriptures remain foundational.
The Messiah fulfills God's purposes.
The nations are welcomed into covenant blessings.
God's instruction continues to reveal His character.
Paul's letters make far more sense when read within this framework.
What Did Paul Actually Teach?
Paul did not teach salvation through Torah observance.
Paul did not require Gentiles to become Jewish.
Paul did not believe human effort could earn righteousness.
At the same time, Paul called the Torah holy, righteous, and good.
He continued participating in Jewish life.
He rejected accusations that he taught Jews to abandon Moses.
The evidence suggests that Paul opposed misuse of the Torah rather than the Torah itself.
His goal was to proclaim Messiah, welcome the nations, and demonstrate God's covenant faithfulness.
That message remains as important today as it was in the first century.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Paul abolish the Torah?
Paul never explicitly says he abolished the Torah. Instead, he teaches that salvation comes through faith rather than Torah observance.
Did Paul continue living as a Jew?
Yes. Acts presents Paul participating in synagogue life, biblical festivals, vows, and Temple practices.
What was Paul's problem with circumcision?
Paul opposed requiring Gentile believers to undergo circumcision as a condition of salvation or covenant membership.
Did Paul think the Torah was bad?
No. Paul describes the Torah as holy, righteous, and good in Romans 7:12.
Related Resources
What Is Messianic Judaism?
Why Should Christians Study the Bible in Its Jewish Context?
Was the Early Church Jewish?
What Does Romans 11 Teach About Israel?
What Are the Biblical Feasts?




Comments